To understand how all the pieces of a desktop virtualization or flexible computing solution can be put together, we will discuss a few examples. The focus will be on the key pieces of any solution including a hypervisor, connection broker, back-end storage, and client type. We will also talk about various components that can be added to optimize the solution.

Technical Community - Background Reading

Virtualization Frontier blog: Why Servergeeks Should Care About Desktops
BrianMadden.com blog: Microsoft Extending TS Connection Broker to Handle VDI


VMware Virtual Desktop Manager 2.1 Dell Deployment Guide
Overview of Dell Virtual Remote Desktop Reference Architecture
Dell Virtual Desktop Infrastructure Sizing Study

Chat Transcript

	DELL-ToddM joined.
DELL-ToddM	Hello Everybody!
	djcortes joined.
	djcortes left.
	shanfont joined.
	fholerc joined.
DELL-ToddM	Welcome Shanfont
shanfont	What's the topic today?
DELL-ToddM	Hey fholerc!
fholerc	Hey
DELL-ToddM	Topic for today is Virtual Desktop Solution Architecture examples
shanfont	Nice
shanfont	Brb everyone.
DELL-ToddM	Intent is to talk about all the pieces you need to make a solution go
DELL-ToddM	We will officially get started in about 10 or 15 minutes. Any specific areas that you guys are interested in?
	DELL-fgonce joined.
DELL-ToddM	Hey Fred!
DELL-fgonce	Hi Todd
shanfont	Storage, what kind of storage we would need for virtual desktops and how much to allocate for each virtual desktop?
shanfont	Just something to get started with—that's SAN storage that is.
DELL-ToddM	Okay, storage is a good area to talk about
DELL-ToddM	Of course, it depends on what you are doing.......
DELL-ToddM	:)
DELL-fgonce	I think the answer is, it depends, as Todd said
DELL-ToddM	It usually takes about 5 to 10 minutes for the majority of the chat crowd to arrive
DELL-ToddM	We might be competing a bit with the election today; so turnout for chat might be light while turnout at polls is high
DELL-fgonce	Customers tell me they are creating VMs between 10 to 40 GB each.
DELL-ToddM	The other competing factor today is that Scott is in jury duty this afternoon
DELL-fgonce	So customers usually start by putting this on a few hundred GB of SAN storage. When their VRD solution grows to hundreds or thousands of users they start looking for alternatives
DELL-ToddM	VRD = Virtual Remote Desktop, your friendly translation service :)
DELL-fgonce	One of the technologies to help reduce the amount of storage is Citrix Provisioning Server.
shanfont	When I evaluated Virtual Desktop Manager I set up a persistent pool of like three VMs, and it allocated the storage on its own, and from what I have seen it was over 200 GB for that pool
DELL-fgonce	I use VRD to include both Citrix XenDesktop and VMware VDI
shanfont	When is Dell going to have their own version of a thin client device? From what I see the 755 is what Dell offers
DELL-ToddM	You limited the pool to 3 VMs?
DELL-ToddM	We just announced a new device, the OptiPlex FX160 last week
DELL-ToddM	It is what I would call a thin client, but I believe that we are calling it a flex client
DELL-ToddM	The reason it is called a flex client is that it has the ability to do more than what a basic thin client can do
DELL-fgonce	VMware View Composer will allow VDI VMs to share the same disk image, similar to Citrix Provisioning Server (Ardence).
	Mark_Norton joined.
DELL-ToddM	Welcome Mark! We are just getting started; you can select Action, Recent Room history to catch up if you would like
DELL-ToddM	Is VMware View Composer part of VDM today, or is that a future product?
DELL-fgonce	Future product
DELL-fgonce	Test
DELL-ToddM	I found a blog post on Brianmadden that talks about the VMware View Composer: http://www.brianmadden.com/blogs/brianmadden/archive/2008/10/13/a-deeper-look-at-vmware-s-upcoming-quot-view-composer-quot-vdi-disk-image-technology-i-e-multiple-vms-sharing-the-same-disk-image.aspx
DELL-ToddM	Right-click links to avoid exiting chat
shanfont	I only created a pool of three because it took up so much space when I tried a pool of five. I only had 300 GB or so to work with
	DELL-fgonce left.
DELL-ToddM	How big was each VM? It's my understanding that the VMware VDI doesn't currently have a way to share disk images, so the size would increase with each VM
Mark_Norton	Good article
	DELL-fgonce joined.
DELL-ToddM	Here's a link for the FX160 home page: http://www.dell.com/content/topics/global.aspx/sitelets/solutions/virtualization/fcs_optiplex_fx160?c=us&cs=555&l=en&s=biz
shanfont	Each VM was probably 75 GB from what I see, so that was probably why it needed so much space. I didn't realize that until now.
DELL-ToddM	Oops never did officialy welcome the start of chat...Welcome to today's chat on Remote Virtual Desktop Architectures. Now lets carry on with what we were talking about
DELL-ToddM	Shanfont - Your initial question was about type of storage; did you mean Fibre Channel or iSCSI? Or another type of storage choice (I think there are many)
DELL-fgonce	This is one of the problems with hosting clients on servers is that you need to make them as efficient as possible. This is true for Citrix Presentation Server (Xenapp), VDI, XenDesktop.
shanfont	We use iSCSI
DELL-ToddM	iSCSI should work great. There has been some discussion about what type of disks to use, the slower ATA or higher speed SAS
DELL-ToddM	I think that the decision between the 7200 RPM ATA and a 15 K SAS comes down to performance expectations
shanfont	We have an EqualLogic, I think 100E, which has SATA drives
DELL-ToddM	EqualLogic is kind of a different story with its ability to optimize performance across all disks in the array; so it will actually to better with SATA than most
DELL-ToddM	Of course, if you have capacity issues, you will almost have to go with RAID-5 to optimize for most capacity
shanfont	Really, we initially set up our storage pool with RAID-50
DELL-ToddM	Using a solution like Citirix Provisioning Server (formerly Ardence), which allows for a single image to be shared, can drastically reduce the amount of needed storage
DELL-ToddM	RAID-50 is good as well
DELL-ToddM	Just RAID 10 is probably not the way to go for you
shanfont	Gotcha
DELL-ToddM	How many desktops are you planning to virtualize?
shanfont	We were looking to do 60 or so. We just got the M1000e enclosures with M600 blades as our host servers. Looking to build up on that.
DELL-ToddM	Interesting, Fred and I were just talking about using blades for these solutions earlier today
DELL-ToddM	We both think that blades are a good solution because they allow you to be very efficient with power and space—more users in less rack space
Mark_Norton	The M1000 allows for flex addressing as well
DELL-ToddM	You will need hypervisor servers as well as a VDM server and possibly a separate Virtual Center server for a VMware VDI solution; are you planning to use blades for all?
Mark_Norton	Flex addressing will let you replace a defective or degraded blade with a new one without having to re-address, or flush the MAC address tables
Mark_Norton	Works with SAN WWN as well
shanfont	Eventually we will go with all blades
DELL-ToddM	I think that blades are a good solution for this, but can you just give your key reasons for selecting blades over maybe traditional 2U or 4U severs?
	depping joined.
DELL-ToddM	Hey Duncan!
depping	Hey, bit late...sorry about that
DELL-ToddM	No problem. You can catch up with Action, Recent Room History
DELL-ToddM	One aspect of the solution is the server hardware: blades, 2-socket, 4-socket
DELL-ToddM	This is of course mainly for the hypervisor servers
shanfont	Space, really. We have two 6850s and was about to get another and then looked at the blades and came to realize we would be able to have more host using less space. Room for growth.
	stevemarfisi joined.
DELL-ToddM	There is also a need for other servers that will manage and act as brokers
shanfont	Can you explain the brokers a bit. I get confused on how that works with VDI
DELL-ToddM	Blades are the most rack-dense solution, although you can now get a 4U R900 with 24 cores (four 6-core processors)
DELL-ToddM	A connection broker allows for a user to simply go to one place to log on, and then be either directly connected to his VM or given a choice of his VMs based on who that user is
DELL-ToddM	So users doesn't have to know where their VM is, or what its hostname or IP address is
shanfont	We were going to get the R900 but long term we are better off with the blades. Price worked out to be better also
DELL-ToddM	In small environements, with just a few users, a connection broker might not be needed
DELL-ToddM	But as the number of users and desktops grows it becomes very difficult to manage all these connections without a broker
DELL-ToddM	Welcome Steve!
DELL-ToddM	In terms of brokers VMware has one in their VDI solution, and Citrix has one in their XenDesktop solution
DELL-ToddM	Many customers will use the broker that is part of the solution that they have chosen
depping	Leostream is also an often-used broker!
DELL-ToddM	I have also seen some customers decide to use the Citrix broker with ESX hypervisor on the back end
	fholerc left.
DELL-ToddM	And there are additional brokers like Leostream out there as well. Good Call depping!
DELL-ToddM	We have touched on storage, servers, and brokers
DELL-ToddM	Another piece is the hypervisor
DELL-ToddM	The choices are really ESX, XenServer, or Hyper-V (although I haven't seen anybody try to use Hyper-V just yet)
depping	I just love the hypervisor ;)
DELL-ToddM	My own opinion is that ESX is the most mature of these choices and has some great features like memory sharing that could be useful in a VDI environment
depping	Indeed, Transparrent Page Sharing is really helpful
DELL-ToddM	XenServer has some great pieces surrounding it in the XenDesktop solution like the provisioning server, Citrix broker, and XenApp (formerly presentation server or Metaframe)
shanfont	ESX hypervisor, is it free for download? Do you need a license to run it?
DELL-ToddM	Microsoft appears to be making some moves to position Hyper-V as a hypervisor for virtual desktops as well, but I don't think that it is here just yet
DELL-ToddM	ESXi is available for free download
DELL-ToddM	The question I have is can you use ESXi as the basis for a remote virtual desktop environment?
depping	No problem at all
DELL-ToddM	There are many features that ESXi does not have when not licensed and used as part of a Virtual Infrastructure solution (or managed by Virtual Center)
depping	No clue why you would want to do it, cause if you buy VDI you also buy ESX
	stevemarfisi left.
DELL-ToddM	No, VMotion is one big one, but that may not be an issue
DELL-ToddM	I don't know if you can put free ESXi as a back-end hypervisor behind a non-VMware broker
shanfont	We just purchased VMware's enterprise license so I don't see a need for ESXi, unless I'm missing something here
depping	No you don't need it
depping	Just use ESX
DELL-ToddM	I agree; just use ESX :)
depping	Although, ESXi is definitely the future
DELL-ToddM	There are some really interesting things coming from VVware in the next year that were announced at VMworld
depping	So test it and get used to it
depping	Yeah, Offline VDI!
DELL-ToddM	That should make the VDI solution more powerful—like linked clones
DELL-ToddM	So this space is one to watch for improvements
depping	Indeed
	Tapioca joined.
DELL-ToddM	I would like to thank everybody for coming to today's chat
DELL-ToddM	Next week will focus on the client side of virtual desktops and examine the options
DELL-ToddM	Of course, I always want to talk about servers and storage so we will probably end up covering that a bit as well :)
	Yosh joined.
DELL-ToddM	Hey Tapioca and Josh!
Yosh	Hi
DELL-ToddM	The chat is just now ending, but I would be happy to hang around for a little bit longer if you guys have some questions
Yosh	I was just stopping by to see what I can learn; don't have any question!
	Mark_Norton left.
shanfont	Thanks Dell dudes
	shanfont left.
	Tapioca left.
depping	Yeah, thanks again; next time I'll try to join on time
	depping left.
DELL-fgonce	Thanks Todd
DELL-ToddM	Cool. The transcript will go up tomorrow morning
DELL-ToddM	Thanks everybody